We Are Change Ireland

Truth Rising Screening @ Pravda, Nov 10, 8pm

October 30, 2008

Time:
Nov 10th @ 8pm (come along at 7:30 for a drink)

Venue:
Pravda (Facing Halfpenny Bridge)
Dublin City Centre

Admission:
We recommend buying a drink or a meal from Pravda (no cover charge).

Watch as the Global Elite and their Minions Tremble before the POWER of Free Speech. An excellent opportunity to bring along friends and family who refuse to watch a film sitting in front of a computer screen and for yourself to watch this inspiring film on Pravda’s big screen. There will be food and drink available to order from Pravda in the reserved film room. The setting of Pravda offers a relaxed atmosphere for socializing with like minded people, a much better setting than a traditional cinema for such a film.

Please forward this on to people whom you think might be interested.

A global awakening has taken place, the likes of which the world has never seen. As the corporate-controlled media dwindles into extinction, a new breed of journalists and activists has emerged. Join We Are Change and others as they set out on a mission determined to expose the ruthless elite, and alert the masses to the truth.

Strap in and get ready to ride along as criminals David Rockefeller, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Bill and Hillary Clinton, Alan Greenspan, John McCain, and many others are confronted about their lies and manipulation.

Interviews with Willie Nelson, Martin Sheen, Jesse Ventura, Rosie O’Donnell, and George Carlin, this film is unlike anything you have ever seen. the only question after viewing it is, will you become part of the Truth Rising.

“Filmed in vibrant cinema-vertie style the dramatic and emotional weaves together. A major success.”

Comments: No Comments »
Categories: Ireland
Comments rss
Trackback

EU Calls For ‘New World Governance’

October 25, 2008

Wise Up Journal
24.10.2008

This video shows Sarkozy (French President holding EU Presidency) and Barroso (EU Commission President) calling for a New World Order, “New World Governance”, “New Global Order”.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a7D21rPpBrk

The two also talk about how the EU and globalists are determined to use crises to setup the final stages of what they call the “New World Order”.

CNN: “Barroso outlined no specific proposals but said a solution needed to be based on transparency, responsibility, cross-border supervision and global governance”

Least we forget with a crisis there is always a silver lining. for the elite few. historically against the general public’s interests and rights. The current banking chaos lead the global banking elites profits being guaranteed by the tax payers and lends to global leaders calling for a restructuring and centralisation of the global financial system and currencies.

Bloomberg: “European Central Bank council member Ewald Nowotny said a tri-polar global currency system is developing between Asia, Europe and the U.S. and that he’s skeptical the U.S. dollars centrality can be revived.”

Watch End Of Nations
Watch EndGame

The clip below from Europarl (http://www.youtube.com/user/europarl) shows Sarkozy also calling for a”Eurozone Economic Government” as well as a “New World Governance”. The EU also discusses the Lisbon treaty in doing so highlighting some dangerous intentions behind the treaty.

Sarkozy calls for “Eurozone Economic Government” and “New World Governance” (also includes: Barroso, Farage, de Villiers)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kTfv6uOHgqQ

Comments: No Comments »
Categories: European Union, Ireland, New World Order
Comments rss
Trackback

Irish Government Funds Drug Company’s Dangerous GM Cancer Virus Jab For Young Girls

August 8, 2008

Wise Up Journal
07.08.2008
by Gabriel O’Hara

Evidence is mounting that Merck’s Gardasil injection, which didn’t go though the proper amount of testing time, the first genetically modified and live virus vaccine has devastating side effects. The vaccine for HPV, a sexually transmitted disease which potentially causes cervical cancer, will be given to all girls in Ireland aged 12 next year.

If only 10,000 girls receive the three course injections, which cost €600 in all, the pharmaceutical corporation will make €6,000,000 from the Irish Government (paid for by the public). The Irish Cancer Society are asking for a wider net to include older girls aged 13 to 15. To be clear these injections will not protect women from breast cancer, which some mistakenly think, and it doesn’t even protect women from HPV cervical cancer as the vaccine only targets 4 of more than 100 strains of HPV. This is stated, slightly, on Merck’s own literature where it is wrote that women will not be protected against “non-vaccine” HPV strains. Sexually active kids partaking in unprotected sex will have virtually an unchanged chance of contracting HPV after taking the vaccination.

The manufacturer of this injection, Merck, also produced Vioxx which was covered in the main stream media as having killed over 60,000 people. In the U.S 1,637 adverse reactions have been logged by Judicial Watch and three girls died shortly after receiving the Cervical Cancer vaccine. Shares of the vaccine’s Australian developer, CSL, fell after Aussie girls were hospitalized due to the “vaccine”. Cancer and vaccines are a multi-billion dollar industry.

When your cousin, niece, daughter, or grand daughter receives these injections next year it’s courtesy of the Government and the people who brought you Vioxx with the backing of the Irish Cancer Society. Should we use our money to help women with breast cancer instead of putting a dangerous genetically altered live virus into Irish girls? Is blind acceptance of authority healthy? The 60,000 individuals who died from Vioxx and their families learned that answer the hard way.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mnTvAneWBZs

Comments: No Comments »
Categories: Ireland
Comments rss
Trackback

One World China Rally Swamps City - 中国

August 6, 2008

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ur7ZxMxD98E

Over 2,000 marched on Dublin’s main street bringing traffic to standstill. The protesters were celebrating China’s tyrannical regime for the Olympics and parading banners saying, “ONE WORLD - ONE CHINA.” When a man made it known he supports Tibet the pro-China protesters did what the Chinese Government would have done and attack him not allowing any alternative views. The police took him in to custody while protesters stood by jeering. When the police van tried to leave it was attacked.

Footage just released from April’s rally.

- China’s crimes against humanity:

Mao more lethal than Hitler, Stalin
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/art…

China admits women were forced to have abortions
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/wor…

Japan’s rich buy organs from executed Chinese prisoners
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/wor…

China to ‘tidy up’ trade in executed prisoners’ organs
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news…

China makes ultimate punishment mobile
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/20…

UN Reports the Chilling Facts on Organ Harvesting from Live Falun Gong Practitioners
http://www.flghrwg.net/index.php?opti…

1989: Massacre in Tiananmen Square
http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/da…

Flawed icon of China’s resurgence
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/1999/chin…

研究:
http://www.wearechangeireland.org
http://www.wiseupjournal.com
http://www.infowars.com
http://www.endgamethemovie.com

Comments: 1 Comment »
Categories: Ireland, New World Order
Comments rss
Trackback

Sarkozy Comes To Dublin - Tyranny On The Street

July 31, 2008

Footage you wont believe until you see it from Sarkozy’ Lisbon Treaty visit to Ireland.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pi-Ptyn2Blo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lKCeXczxjSk

Comments: 2 Comments »
Categories: Ireland
Comments rss
Trackback

Mass Medication of Ireland

July 21, 2008

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HboWZlznAis

MEP Kathy Sinnott discussing the mass medication of Ireland without its citizens’ permission. Fluoride which is used externally on teeth and spat out is added to the water supply for internal use. The dose that each child and adult unwittingly consumes daily can not be known. The Irish government buys Fluoride as industrial waste then dumps it into the bodies of its citizens.

The government uses our tax money to mass medicate us and unlike the rich the poor cannot afford to avoid it, if they want to, because they will not be able to afford expensive removal equipment.

- Paul Connett, PhD:

“Fluoridation is UNETHICAL because:

1) It violates the individual’s right to informed consent to medication.
2) The municipality cannot control the dose of the patient.
3) The municipality cannot track each individual’s response.
4) It ignores the fact that some people are more vulnerable to fluoride’s toxic effects than others.
5) It violates the Nuremberg code for human experimentation.

As stated by Dr. Peter Mansfield, a physician from the UK and advisory board member of the recent government review of fluoridation (McDonagh et al 2000):

“No physician in his right senses would prescribe for a person he has never met, whose medical history he does not know, a substance which is intended to create bodily change, with the advice: ‘Take as much as you like, but you will take it for the rest of your life because some children suffer from tooth decay. ‘ It is a preposterous notion.”

Water Fluoridation is INEFFECTIVE [for dental health] because:

1) Major dental researchers concede that fluoride’s benefits are topical not systemic (Fejerskov 1981; Carlos 1983; CDC 1999, 2001; Limeback 1999; Locker 1999; Featherstone 2000).
2) Major dental researchers also concede that fluoride is ineffective at preventing pit and fissure tooth decay, which is 85% of the tooth decay experienced by children (JADA 1984; Gray 1987; White 1993; Pinkham 1999).
3) Several studies indicate that dental decay is coming down just as fast, if not faster, in non-fluoridated industrialized countries as fluoridated ones (Diesendorf, 1986; Colquhoun, 1994; World Health Organization, Online).
4) The largest survey conducted in the US showed only a minute difference in tooth decay between children who had lived all their lives in fluoridated compared to non-fluoridated communities. The difference was not clinically significant nor shown to be statistically significant (Brunelle & Carlos, 1990).
5) The worst tooth decay in the United States occurs in the poor neighborhoods of our largest cities, the vast majority of which have been fluoridated for decades.
6) When fluoridation has been halted in communities in Finland, former East Germany, Cuba and Canada, tooth decay did not go up but continued to go down (Maupome et al, 2001; Kunzel and Fischer, 1997, 2000; Kunzel et al, 2000 and Seppa et al, 2000).”

http://www.wiseupjournal.com/?p=117
http://www.wiseupjournal.com/?p=100

Comments: 2 Comments »
Categories: Ireland
Comments rss
Trackback

EU Star Wars - Lisbon Treaty Battle for the Republic (Comedy Clip)

July 16, 2008

Satire of the European Union in it’s anti-democratic/tyrannical attitude.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tknIITNeK-E

Comments: No Comments »
Categories: European Union, Ireland, New World Order
Comments rss
Trackback

The End of Double Jeopardy

June 27, 2008

Wise Up Journal
26.06.2008
By Greg O’Brien

With NO riots in the streets and NO headlines in the media!

Dermot Ahern, the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform announced this week a bill to abolish the long practice of double jeopardy, where a person, once acquitted, could not be tried again and again for the same offence. Nobody took notice. It was once again brought in through stealth, and under the guise of popular legislation. There were NO riots on the streets, NO headlines in the media, NO highlight of the issue by our Public Service Broadcaster, just business as usual.

Press release to abolish Double Jeopardy:

[Bolded emphasis by author.]

“Dermot Ahern announces Justice for Victims Initiative

Major New Legislative Package on the Way

The Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, Mr. Dermot Ahern T.D. today announced a major new initiative for victims of crime entitled the Justice for Victims Initiative.

The Initiative includes important legislative features including:

· A new groundbreaking Bill addressing Justice for Victims of Crime to be drafted, and presented, to the Oireachtas early next year. This Bill, which will be a substantial piece of legislative reform, will contain measures to:

· Reform the victim impact statement mechanism in order to grant victim status to next of kin in homicide cases.

· Introduce new mechanisms to deal with an acquittal where compelling evidence of guilt emerges after the acquittal.

· Enable cases to be re-opened where an acquittal arises from an error in law by a Judge.

· Provide for new prosecutions where there is evidence that the original acquittal was tainted by interference with the trial process, including intimidation of witnesses.

· Introduce measures to restrict unjustified and vexatious imputations at trial against the character of a deceased or incapacitated victim or witness.

In addition to these legislative proposals, the Minister has announced a series of administrative moves to increase supports to victims. These include:

· The establishment of a New Executive Office of the Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform to support crime victims, focusing on the co-ordination of delivery of services.

· A reconstituted Commission for the Support of Victims of Crime - with a role to distribute funding to groups working with crime victims, as well as providing general oversight of services and promoting awareness.

· A Victims of Crime Consultative Forum, representing victims’ interests, which will liaise with the Commission.

The Minister announced the new Initiative at the publication of a new framework document prepared by the Commission for the Support of Victims of Crime, the recommendations of which the Minister said he intends to implement.”

So let’s take a look at what this Commission actually recommended to find the source for this legislation. In March, 2005 the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform established the Commission for the Support of Victims of Crime with a remit to:

a) to devise an appropriate framework for victims of crime into the future

and

b) disburse funding for victim support measures.

5.1 Research Findings - Main Points

The research was conducted with groups that word with and support victims of crime.

The main findings were:

That while there are more and more organisations/services supporting victims the perception is that little has been done for victims and victims’ rights.

Concern about the adequacy of support services and the consistency of supports.

That more could be done within the criminal justice system to support victims and to improve the experience of interacting with the system.

Those interviewed felt there should be an enforceable charter and a national agency for victims.

The generation of ‘referrals’ and the impact of the data protection legislation featured as problems for NGOs {Prior to this legislation Gardai could pass the name of a victim to a Victim Support organization without needing the consent of the victim.}*

That more training should be given to Gardai and Courts personnel, including the Judiciary.

That our legal system does not recognise the victim as a player was also highlighted

The issue of compensation /expenses for victims

Secondary victimisation experience (i.e. a feeling of again being assaulted/violated) while interacting with the Gardai and legal system was highlighted by NGOs as an issue for victims

The Minister also stated:

“It is my intention to have this legislation published in the Spring. The legislation will take account of several recommendations in the 2007 Report of the Balance in the Criminal Law Review Group.”

What did The Review Group have to says about Nullifying acquittals:

“The Review Group considers that there are clear advantages to the creation of a statutory mechanism for review of improperly achieved acquittals. Such a mechanism would in the first instance correct a miscarriage of justice which has improperly resulted in the acquittal of an accused person. Such a mechanism would also provide a much more significant deterrent to the improper behaviour of defendants who interfere with the trial process than would be provided by the alternative possibility of prosecution for a free standing offence of perverting the course of justice or contempt of court. And thirdly, such a procedure would enhance confidence in the courts system and ensure the integrity of trials so far as that can be achieved.

Most of the objections that could be considered to ‘with prejudice’ appeals generally would also apply to a mechanism for review of a verdict which has been arrived at following interference with the trial process. The Review Group has carefully considered all of these objections, as set out in an earlier section of this report, and takes the view that none of them are convincing. Again, we consider that any such appeal should be to the Supreme Court.

In addition to those objections, however, the case of review of a verdict arrived at following interference with the trial process does involve the additional factor that in this case, the Director would be seeking to interfere with what would ostensibly be a decision by a jury on the merits. However, for the reasons 213 outlined by Walsh J. in O’Shea, there is no public interest in preserving as inviolable a jury verdict which has been tainted by interference with the trial process. Instead the overwhelming public interest is in ensuring that criminal trials are conducted, in the words of Article 38.1 of the Constitution “i due course of law.” For the reasons outlined by Walsh J., the Review Group considers that there can be no fundamental constitutional or principled objection to revisiting jury acquittals which were brought about by or influenced by interference of an unlawful kind with the trial process.

Options for Change
The Review Group has considered a number of possible options for a statutory provision dealing with this issue. In particular the Review Group has considered the following:-

Issue 1: Whether review should be permitted where there is evidence of interference with the jury, with witnesses, or with evidence or other aspects of the trial, or in all such circumstances.

Issue 2: Whether the review should be permitted in cases of intimidation only, or also where there is bribery or any other form of corruption or unlawful interference.

Issue 3: Whether the standard of review should be reasonable possibility, probability or compelling evidence of interference with the trial process, or whether the legislation should merely provide for the evidence to be such as to be sufficient in the opinion of the Supreme Court to warrant a quashing of the acquittal.

The Review Group has considered these options carefully. We consider that review of acquittals should be available in the event of interference with the trial process, whether in respect of the jury or otherwise. The Supreme Court would have to be satisfied that there is sufficient evidence warranting a quashing of the acquittal.”

We have been duped, once again, by our Rogue Government. This time to bring an end to double jeopardy by sinister means.

Once again they have used NGOs and other bodies to bring in prohibitive legislation.

Once again they have used the same modus operandi of using isolated incidents, in this case intimidation of witnesses, to further restrict the masses.

Once again they have ignored the criticisms against our judiciary and the government apparatus.

Once again YOU pay the price and are subject to the full rigors of the law while those at the top get away with murder.

Once again the people just sit back and take it, one more liberty taken away, while they are distracted by mindless entertainment.

Once again future generations will have to suffer the consequences of our apathy, our lack of discernment and our willingness to sit back while we are heading into a fascist dictatorship by a rogue government.

Remarks by the Tánaiste (deputy prime minister) in Limerick - 20th October, 2006:

“I am strongly committed to our system of open trial, to our system of jury trial, to adversarial trial in which evidence is tested in front of the jury, and where the role of the judge is to ensure a fair and impartial trial process, not to act as inquisitor.

I am equally convinced that the burden of proof must generally lie on the prosecution and that proof must be of a standard beyond reasonable doubt. But the constitutional right to trial by jury and to trial in due course of law exists to serve the common good, not as an end in itself.”

The Irish Council for Civil Liberties (ICCL) said the changes proposed by the Minister would reduce the rights of those accused of crimes without improving life for victims. “It is a fallacy that taking liberties from accused persons can enhance the lives of victims. If the Government is genuinely interested in advancing the situation of victims then it must adopt a rights-based approach, including a statutory charter for victims of crime,” said ICCL director Mark Kelly.

“Instead, Minister Ahern has chosen to market as ‘pro-victim’ a series of half-baked measures limiting the rights of accused persons. Victims deserve a far better deal than this,” he added.

Comments: No Comments »
Categories: Ireland
Comments rss
Trackback

U.S. Military Drop-off Undisclosed Cargo at Dublin Airport

June 16, 2008

Wise Up Journal
16.06.2008

During the distraction of an important referendum count in Dublin last Friday a U.S. military aircraft (the large $218 million dollar C17) landed at Dublin Airport. Dublin airport authority confirmed that the U.S. military dropped off undisclosed cargo.

The drop-off did not have the earmarks of a mere delivery of common materials. One of the remarkable aspects of this event was the great significance put upon the unaccounted for cargo by the U.S. government, which required military transportation and its contents to be kept covert.

According To the Star
“The plane is a C17 used by the Us AirForce as a troop and cargo plane. A spokesperson for the Dublin Airport Authority confirmed to The Star last night that the plane was US military.

“It was bringing cargo to the Us Embassy. We don’t know what the cargo was, but even if we did, we wouldn’t be at liberty to discuss it,” the spokesperson explained.

“We have no role in giving permission for military flights, that’s up to the government.”

A spokesperson for the Department of Foreign Affairs confirmed they were aware of the flight and that permission had been granted.”
- Irish Daily Star, Star 14 June 2008